
Opposition parties reject 2026 Electoral Act amendment
Several opposition parties have rejected the 2026 Electoral Act, describing it as inadequate and calling for a fresh amendment to address what they termed critical gaps in Nigeria’s electoral framework. The parties argued that the current version of the law does not sufficiently guarantee transparency, accountability and fairness ahead of future elections.
The opposition groups said key provisions of the Act fail to strengthen the independence of the Independent National Electoral Commission and do not adequately tackle issues such as result transmission, voter accreditation and dispute resolution timelines. According to party representatives, a comprehensive review is necessary to restore public confidence in the electoral process and prevent avoidable controversies.
Leaders of the affected parties maintained that electoral reforms must reflect the realities observed in recent elections, including concerns over low voter turnout, logistical challenges and allegations of irregularities. They insisted that amendments should focus on strengthening digital transmission of results, clarifying guidelines on party primaries and enhancing penalties for electoral offences.
In response, some lawmakers have defended the 2026 Electoral Act, stating that it was passed after wide consultations and that it represents an improvement on previous legislation. They argued that no law is perfect and that adjustments can still be made through legislative procedures without discarding the entire framework.
Political analysts say the demand for a fresh amendment reflects growing tensions between the ruling party and opposition blocs as preparations gradually begin for the next general election cycle. They note that electoral reforms often become a focal point of debate in Nigeria’s political landscape, especially when trust in institutions is under scrutiny.
As discussions continue at the National Assembly and within party structures, attention will focus on whether lawmakers agree to reopen the Act for further amendment or maintain the current provisions. The outcome could shape the conduct of future elections and influence voter confidence in the democratic process.
