Appeal Court Affirms Order Restricting INEC from Recognising ADC Congresses Conducted by Mark-Led Leadership
The Court of Appeal has upheld a judgment restraining the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from recognising congresses organised by the leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) under the chairmanship of Senator David Mark.
The appellate court, in its ruling, affirmed the earlier decision of the lower court, holding that the electoral umpire should not accord official recognition to any congresses, conventions or party activities conducted by the Mark-led executives pending the determination of the substantive issues before the court.
The judgment represents another significant development in the legal disputes surrounding the leadership of the ADC, a party that has continued to attract attention ahead of preparations for the 2027 general elections. The internal disagreements have resulted in multiple court cases, with rival factions laying claim to the party’s leadership and organisational structure.
According to the court, the appeal lacked sufficient merit to overturn the earlier judgment. Consequently, the appellate court upheld the order preventing INEC from recognising congresses organised by the disputed leadership until all legal questions relating to the matter have been conclusively resolved.
The ruling is expected to have implications for the party’s ongoing efforts to restructure its leadership and prepare for future electoral activities. Political observers believe the decision could affect plans for congresses, conventions and other internal processes pending the final determination of the leadership dispute.
The controversy within the ADC intensified after changes in the party’s leadership structure generated disagreements among members over the legitimacy of the executives and the procedures followed in constituting the leadership. The dispute later found its way to the courts as aggrieved members sought judicial intervention.
Legal experts noted that the judgment reinforces the principle that parties involved in leadership disputes must comply with existing court orders while awaiting the final resolution of their cases. They explained that INEC, as the nation’s electoral management body, is legally bound to comply with valid court decisions concerning political parties.
The decision has generated mixed reactions among members of the party and political stakeholders. While supporters of the judgment described it as a victory for due process and the rule of law, others expressed concern that the prolonged litigation could affect the party’s readiness for upcoming political activities.
Analysts also observed that internal stability remains crucial for any political party seeking to compete effectively in national elections. They argued that resolving leadership disputes through lawful means would strengthen confidence among party members and supporters.
Meanwhile, the Independent National Electoral Commission is expected to comply with the appellate court’s ruling as the legal process continues. The commission has consistently maintained that it operates within the provisions of the Constitution, the Electoral Act and binding court judgments in carrying out its responsibilities.
The appellate court’s decision does not finally determine the broader leadership dispute within the ADC but preserves the existing legal position pending the hearing and determination of the substantive suit. As a result, the parties involved are expected to continue pursuing their respective legal arguments before the appropriate court.
Political observers believe the outcome of the substantive case could significantly influence the future direction of the ADC and its preparations for the 2027 elections. Until then, party members and stakeholders are expected to await further judicial pronouncements on the matter.
The latest judgment underscores the judiciary’s continuing role in resolving disputes arising from political party administration and internal democracy. It also serves as a reminder that compliance with court orders remains an essential aspect of Nigeria’s democratic and electoral processes.
About the Author
